New Delhi: Former AAP councillor Tahir Hussain has approached Delhi High Court against his conviction and life sentence for the murder of Intelligence Bureau (IB) staffer Ankit Sharma during the Feb 2020 riots, saying the investigation was aimed at implicating him to satisfy public anger.The appeal is likely to come up for hearing next week.“The investigation against the appellant has been tainted since the very beginning, aimed at implicating him in order to satisfy public anger. The FIR is ante-dated and ante-timed, no material investigation was carried out until March 6, 2020, that is, till the appellant was arrested in another case,” Hussain has contended in his appeal.He further alleged that the witnesses have been planted in the case and statements of genuine eyewitnesses have been manipulated and that the actual perpetrators have not been brought to book.Hussain said the trial court’s July 13 conviction order and July 31 sentencing order should be set aside. The trial court has believed the statements of completely unreliable witnesses and relied upon those who did not witness the incident and completely ignored the tainted investigation, including the fabrication of the complaint on which the FIR was based, he contended.According to the prosecution, on Feb 26, 2020, complainant Ravinder Kumar informed Dayalpur police station officials that his son Ankit Sharma, who was posted in the Intelligence Bureau, was missing since Feb 25, 2020.He later learnt from some locals that a person’s body was dumped in the Khajuri Khas nala after he was murdered.The prosecution alleged that Sharma’s body was found in the Khajuri Khas nala and there were 51 injuries on his body.The trial court, on July 31, sentenced Hussain and four others — Nazim, Qasim, Javed and Anas — to life imprisonment for the IB officer’s murder, saying the case did not fall within the “rarest of rare” category warranting the death penalty.Hussain was convicted under IPC sections 302 (murder), 365 (kidnapping or abducting with intent secretly and wrongfully to confine a person), 147 (rioting), 148 (rioting armed with a deadly weapon), 153A (promoting enmity) and 188 (disobedience to an order duly promulgated by a public servant), read with Section 149 (unlawful assembly).On July 13, the trial court convicted all five for Sharma’s murder, holding that they were members of a heavily armed unlawful assembly that assaulted and killed the IB officer during the communal violence.
